When there is a merger, acquisition or other major organizational change, the different cultures must be blended into a coherent new culture. Managers often assume this will happen naturally over time, so they do not focus on this aspect when planning the merger.
WRONG! Achieving a stable culture where people are at least supportive if not enthusiastically driving a singular mindset is the most significant challenge for most change efforts. Do not assume things will work out; instead, take a highly proactive approach to defining a new culture.
In every case, even when the action is described as a merger of equals, one group will feel they have been “taken over” by the other. Curiously, in many instances, both groups feel they have been taken over because employees in each former group will need to modify procedures to accomplish the union.
Usually, one of the parties is assumed to be in the driver’s seat, so it is the other party that needs to endure the bulk of changing systems. Lack of trust and genuine animosity lead to resistance when it comes to blending the two groups into one.
It is common to have the conflict occur as passive resistive behavior. People will have the appearance of agreeing, but subversively undermine the other group however possible. This kind of “we – they” thinking can go on for years if allowed. So what actions can management take to mitigate the schism and promote unity? Here are a dozen ideas that can help.
1. Start early – Do not let the inevitable seeds of doubt and suspicion grow in the dark. Work quickly after the merger is announced to have teambuilding activities.
Openly promote good team spirit and put some money into developing a mutually supportive culture. Good teamwork is not rocket science, but it does not occur naturally. There must be investments to accomplish unity.
2. Have zero tolerance for silo thinking – This is hard to accomplish because human beings will polarize if given the opportunity. Set the expectation that people will at least try at all times to get along.
Monitor the wording in notes and conversations carefully and call people out when they put down the other group. This monitoring needs to include body language. Often rolling eyes or other expressions give away underlying mistrust.
3. Blend the populations as much as possible – Transplant key individuals from Group A with counterparts from Group B. If this is done with care, it will not take long for the individual cultures to be hard to tell apart. Sometimes the transplanting process is unpopular, but it is an important part of the integration process.
4. Use the Strategic Process – It is important to have a common set of goals and a common vision. If the former groups have goals that are not perfectly aligned, then behaviors are going to support parochial thinking. When conflicts arise, check to see if the goals are really common or if there is just lip service on this point.
5. Reward good teamwork – Seek out examples of selfless behavior from one group toward the other and promote these as bellwether activities. Verbal and written reinforcement from the top will help a lot. You might consider some kind of award for outstanding integration behavior.
6. Model integrated behavior at the top – Often we see animosity and lack of trust at the highest levels, so it is only natural for the lower echelon to be bickering. People have the ability to pick up on the tiny clues in wording and body language. The leaders need to walk the talk on mutual respect.
7. Co-locate groups where possible – Remote geography always tends to build polarization in any organization. If merged groups can be at least partially located under one roof, it will help to reduce suspicion by lack of contact. If cohabitation is cost prohibitive, it is helpful to have frequent joint meetings, especially at the start of the integration process.
8. Benchmark other organizations – Select one or two companies who have done a great job of blending cultures and send a fact finding team made up of representatives from each group to identify best practices. This team can be the nucleus of cooperation attitudes that can allow unity to spread through the entire population.
9. Make celebrations include both groups – Avoid letting one group celebrate milestones along the way while the other group is struggling. Make sure the celebrations are for progress toward the ultimate culture instead of sub-unit performance.
10. Align measures with joint behavior – Make sure the measures are not contributing to silo thinking. If the goals are aligned for joint performance, have the measures reinforce behaviors toward those goals. Often, well intentioned measures actually drive activity that is directly opposite to the intended result.
One way to test for this potential is to ask, “what if someone pushes this measure to the extreme – will that still produce the result we want”?
11. Weed out people who cannot adjust – A certain percentage of the population in either group are going to find it difficult to get over the grieving process. Identify these individuals and help them find roles in some other organization. It will help both the merger process and the individual.
On the flip side, identify the champions of integration early and reward them with more exposure and more span of control.
12. Create incentives for the desired behavior – People should be encouraged in every way to act and think in an integrated way. This can be encouraged by having the incentive plans pay out only if the joined entity performs seamlessly.
The road to a fully functioning integrated culture can be long and frustrating. By following the ideas given above, an organization can hasten the day when there are few vestiges of the old cultures, and people feel a sense of belonging to a single new order.
Great post, as usual, Bob.
Another thought to add to your fine list, and building on what you have said above, is as follows:
*Assemble a group of key leaders from both cultures.
*Have them collectively define the current culture and micro cultures.
* Have them define the desired single culture and consistent micro cultures. (Write it down on < 1 page for all too have.)
*Note that you have defined the gap: now to ideal.
*Brainstorm how they can help to fill the gap. What can they do specifically in their work? (E.G., To complete a key project some one has, form a cross-organizational task force to do it.)
*Enlist a guiding coalition to follow-up and regularly report on the gap-filling work.
*Commit to keep this culture-blending work on visible agendas for people to see.
Hope this helps, friend.
Hi Bob. Thanks for the great wisdom. I agree with your additions. They really discuss the details and specific steps in what I was trying to describe in my point #4. Identifying the gap between the current reality and the envisioned state is essential to the development of a strategy to get there. I particularly like your stepwise process, Bob.
Bob, I have dealt with one situation where it became very clear that the two cultures should not be merged. A merger would destroy the unique (from a business and social perspectives). So for me at least I would always check to determine whether there is more to lose than gain by some form of cultural assimilation. If the answer is no there is more to gain by assimilation then your list makes good sense to me.
Great point, Mark. There are some situations where you want to keep the two entities separate forever. In those cases, it may have been better to just forget the merger and stay two separate organizations optimized as such.
[…] http://thetrustambassador.com/2015/03/14/merging-cultures/ […]
Thank you for the article. When generic corporate culture expands into intercultural dynamics and international business protocols, the complexities increase. Bob Whipple’s 12 tips apply yet “how” they would be best implemented can differ. Rewards, incentives, team building, communications from top down and bottom up, are assured more success if intercultural awareness and competency is known and applied.