I enjoy reading Seth Goden’s blog. Sometimes he is a little off the deep end for me, but there is always some kind of twist that makes me think more deeply about his topic. About a year ago, Seth wrote an article entitled “Trustiness.” He made a contrast between genuine trust, where the real thing is being practiced, and the counterfeit situation where vendors do a lot of talking about trust but are really living a lie.
There are numerous situations where we think we are purchasing a good quality product or service only to be disappointed later on because we did not read the fine print. Seth mentioned financial institutions as a good example, where it is often impossible to know what you’re buying until very late in the game. It is an industry that often dupes consumers.
The example that immediately sprang to my mind was the insurance business. We buy a policy, and we are told the coverage is comprehensive. The brochure is impressive. We pay the premiums for many years and never find ourselves in a position where we need to use the policy. Eventually, something happens, and we attempt to file a claim. That is when we find out that the product we bought had loopholes where we really were not fully covered. Reading the policy carefully before purchase should cure this situation, but I don’t think so.
My observation is that no human being, except the policy author, would be able to fully understand all the exclusions, qualifications, deductibles, copayments, and restrictions when trying to read it. Basically, insurance companies can get away with duping customers because most consumers do not take the time to read every bit of the fine print. If they are like me, they may read the fine print but fail to see the clever loophole within the verbiage. I tend to get lost in the “does not apply unless the non-exclusion clause has not been rejected.” Hello?
I may be jaded about the insurance industry, but having been disappointed many times in my life on rather large ticket items, I have come to be a serious skeptic when dealing with insurance organizations. Unfortunately, we are forced to carry insurance to guard against catastrophic financial loss. The thing that bugs me most is that you never know if you’re really covered until it comes time to file a claim.
Social networking is really helping the situation because organizations can no longer hide the truth behind some kind of smokescreen. Progressive Insurance found that out in August of 2012 when they refused to pay benefits for the accidental death of Matt Fisher’s sister, Kate. Progressive ended up helping to defend the person responsible for the accident, essentially using Kate’s premiums to litigate against the case brought by her parents to force Progressive to pay what they owed to her estate.
When confronted in the social media, Progressive Insurance tried to weasel out of the truth by using carefully-crafted language. The Claims General Manager wrote, “To be very clear, Progressive did not serve as the attorney for the defendant in this case. He was defended by his insurance company, Nationwide.” Court records produced by the hoard of social networkers proved the statement was misleading at best, because Progressive Insurance attorney, Jeffrey Moffet actually argued the case against Kate in court. In a matter of hours the twitter networks lit up and exposed the scandal. Progressive suffered massive and irreversible damage as a result. Flo will never be the same!
What Progressive Insurance did is not much different from what other organizations do, except that when they were caught red-handed, they tried to finesse their way out of the problem. In this environment of social networks, that approach leads to massive damage.
It did my heart good to see an organization become caught in their own web of falsehood, but my relief was only temporary. I realized that in the vast majority of cases, the tricks that are pulled to swindle people who have paid their premiums for years are defensible from a legal point of view if not from an ethical perspective. I honestly believe that a good portion of the profit for insurance companies is based on tricking people. That may be an unfair accusation, but it is the impression I consistently experience.
We are moving in the direction of higher transparency by sheer weight of public opinion and the availability of information in this internet age. I am happy to report that some companies have gotten the message. Long ago we switched our automobile insurance to a group with a reputation for straight forward language and fair claims processing. We had had the occasion to file a claim, and we were delighted with the response. More recently, we switched medical insurance from an organization that seemed to invent hassles to one that is prompt, reliable, and responsive. As Warren Bennis observed in Transparency, “More and more companies are choosing transparency for two reasons: they have less and less choice – and it works.”
In the end, for any business to survive, they must demonstrate they are worthy of real trust, and not be a sham that appears trustworthy until tested. I think the social networking groups are doing our civilization a great service by uncovering some of the underhanded activities that go on all the time. Sometimes organizations get a bum rap in the social networking arena, so it behooves any organization to stay on top of the chatter and lead out with the truth in plain English when overzealous Tweeters eviscerate the facts.
As Goden stated so well, “Trust is built when no one is looking, when you think you have the option of cutting corners, and when you find a loophole. Trustiness is what happens when you use trust as a PR tool.”
Top executives of organizations can no longer hide behind smokescreens or legal-speak in order to maximize profits at the expense of innocent customers. If they try, they will ultimately be brought to justice by the very masses of individuals they are trying to deceive.
It is hard to dispute the fact that car shopping
is a stressful, anxiety-ridden task for many individuals.
The sheer size of the expenditure involved and the myriad of
choices on the market make the need for education and information quite
critical. Fortunately, the tips below can make the process far simpler than
you may have believed.
Sսperb post however , I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject?
I’d be verƴ thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further.
Well, here is some more similar information for an article I am currently writing on retirement. Enjoy…
If you can watch more than 30 minutes of television without hearing the word “retirement,” you are better than I. (Actually, if you can watch more than 30 minutes of TV at all, you are different from me.) The number of advertisements for people willing to charge you a fee for doing what you could be doing for yourself is amazing. You can even sell your home without really selling it (called a reverse mortgage), so you can “enjoy your retirement – and the best part is you still own your home.” If you believe that line, give me a call, I have a bridge I want to sell you.
The other phony line is where they want to sell you death insurance. I call it that because that is what you are insuring. “You cannot be turned down, your benefits will never go down, and your rate will never go up, due to age.” (Of course your rate probably will go up because the insurance company is going broke, but why should they tell you that when they are trying to sell you the death insurance.) It is total hogwash.
I just couldn’t leave your website prior to suggesting that I
actually loved the usual info an individual provide on your
guests? Is going to be back often in order to
inspect new posts
We’re a bunch of volunteers and starting a brand
new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to
work on. You have performed an impressive task and our entire community will be grateful to you.
If you are in search of talented professionals, then Career – Builder for Employers will help you to find out the most suitable
candidates. It would be cool to be able to compose e-mails
or text message by just using your voice, no. The i – Phone,
by contrast, is still a slave to i – Tunes for activation and media syncing.
Thanks for finally talking about >Trust ѵs Trustiness | <Loved it!