Death by Micromanagement

Everybody hates to be micromanaged. So why do so many managers do it? We know that overbearing, but well intended, managers micromanage all the time in an attempt to optimize performance. I will identify the cure for this habitual dilemma in this article.

The problem is that by micromanaging people, the manager is severely limiting performance rather than optimizing it, so the manager is operating at cross purposes to his stated goal. Unwittingly, the manager is removing incentive for effort and creativity on the part of the employee. We are so familiar with this problem simply because it is rampant in our organizations (Bielaszka-DuVernay, Harvard Business Review, June 23, 2008). Let us contrast micromanagement versus trust to give some insight on how the latter leads to greatly enhanced performance.

To micromanage someone implies a lack of trust. The manager is not confident the employee can or will do a job correctly, so the employee is besieged with “helpful” instructions from the manager on exactly how to perform tasks. At first, the intrusion is simply irritating to the employee, who has her own ideas on how to do the job. After a while, it degenerates into an opportunity to check out mentally and join the legion of disenchanted workers doing what they are told and collecting a paycheck. This leaves the employee’s power on the door step of the organization every day.

Another drawback is that employees will try to avoid a manager who tends to micromanage, simply to reduce the aggravation. This leads to a circular decline, where the manager has less and less information, so he tries even harder to intervene and direct activities. This makes people want to avoid him even more.

To trust an employee is to think enough of the person to treat him or her as a thinking person who can have good ideas if given a goal and some broad operating parameters. In an environment of trust, employees have the freedom to explore, innovate, create, stretch, and yes, sometimes make mistakes. These mistakes can be thought of as waste, but enlightened leaders think of them simply as learning opportunities.

Here are nine ideas that can help leaders and managers reduce the tendency to micromanage, thus unleashing a greater portion of the power available to the organization.

1. Set clear goals and make sure your employees have the basic skills and tools to do the job.
2. Be clear on the broad constraints within which the employee must operate. In other words do not let the employee try to conquer the world with a tuna-fish can.
3. Express trust in the employee and encourage creativity and risk taking as long as the risks are well-considered and safe.
4. Reject the temptation to step in if the employee seems to struggle, rather make yourself available if there are any questions or requests for help.
5. Provide the resources the employee needs to accomplish the tasks.
6. Do not totally overload the employee with so many duties and projects that she cannot succeed at any of them.
7. Express praise and gratitude for positive baby steps along the way.
8. Give the employee time and space to try different approaches without having to explain why she is doing every step.
9. If problems occur, consider them as learning experiences and ask the employee to describe how she will do things differently next time.

These nine ideas are all simple, but they are nearly impossible for a micromanager to accomplish without constant effort. The concept of trusting employees does involve some risk, but the rewards of having people working up to their full potential rather than just complying is well worth that risk. You will see better, faster, and more robust solutions if you trust people and let their natural talents surface in an environment of less micromanagement.

15 Responses to Death by Micromanagement

  1. Rajiv goyal says:

    absolutely correct. Two of my colleagues are victim of this desease by claiming themselves to possess all technical knowledge. Infect, at many occasion they have over ruled others opininon and do not allow others to even express their views.
    Generally such people can not change themselves. In the interest of organisation, top management should offer them positions where they can excel technically probably with a smaller teams. Handling machines and human being requires extremely divergent skill sets

    • trustambassador says:

      Right Rajiv. It is amazing how much abuse of power exists in the business world. If you treat people well, they generally respond well.

  2. Excellent article as always. I look forward to each weeks instalment. I find that those who tend to micromanage are also those who are control “freaks”. They are afraid that any error that the team may make will reflect poorly on them, missing your point that if they just took that risk the enhanced performance of the team will actually reflect positively on them as a leader.

  3. Rekha Singh says:

    Excellent article. Very valuable leadership coaching.

  4. trustambassador says:

    Thanks Rekha. What business are you in?

  5. Hi Robert, the same applies to trust between organizations. Contracts that are too detailed or restrictive or excess hierarchy and monitoring create distrust and avoidance, just as you describe it at the organizational level. Plus it costs more in terms of dollars and time to try to control and oversee everything – not to mention that it is impossible to accomplish. From a cost and a results perspective, research shows that it is better to draft broad guidelines, common goals, clarify roles, provide adequate resources and then let people trust one another and innovate.

    • trustambassador says:

      Right you are, Dominique. I am focusing on trust between organizations in the book I am currently writing. It is a fascinating topic to me. Maintaining trust is critical, yet very tricky when omor than one organization is involved. Many thanks for your comments.

  6. Just Plain Tired says:

    I enjoyed reading your article. I would happily work for someone who practiced what you wrote. I’m #6. When I said that my workload was making my knees buckle, my workload increased. Now, I have a coworker who is visibly not working (audible personal phone calls) while I’m drowning. I did request a detail, but that was denied. I was hoping to stay b/c I love the perks; however, after thoughtful analysis of work/life balance, stress, health issues, workload and the extreme lack of respect that I face daily, the perks are beginning to lose their luster. I can attest to this article that I definitely do NOT trust my (micro)manager.

  7. Reginald says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I truly feel this site needs a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the advice!

  8. Reblogged this on Gr8fullsoul.

  9. Teresa Smith says:

    Thank you for the 1-9 description of a micromanage experience, as I read them, I felt as if you knew exactly what I just went through. I only wish I knew a good lawyer to proceed with a lawsuit. This experience has left me drain and emotionally disturbed. I am so afraid what my next boss will be like.

  10. trustambassador says:

    Sorry you had that experience, Teresa. The best defense is to ask current workers who work for your would be boss in the interview process what it is like to work for him or her.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: